Easing your passage from and to India
Delegation in reverse
16th of May 2011
Shying away from taking decisions and instead falling back on a senior is certainly not the path to growth.
One of my Finnish clients wrote me this e-mail the other day as a follow-up to our discussion on handling teams in India: “A phenomenon that surprises me is the attempt at reverse delegation. Even the most junior staff may come to me and request: ‘‘A’… we want you to do this….’ or ‘will you do that…’. Or, I might receive an e-mail saying: ‘You are requested to…’ It took me some time to learn how to deal with these situations.
This is clearly not what ‘A’ was used to back in Helsinki. In fact, this isn’t the norm in most parts of the Western work world.
But the truth is, it is something we come across repeatedly in interactions with people in corporate India. Recently, I even told the President of a small-sized company that this was something she needed to come to grips with, nay, resist, given her new demanding, national role.
I would like to share a series of real life instances, which show reverse delegation in a variety of scenarios.
Story 1:
Shyam didn’t feel he had enough information on the course that he was to run for the virtual team working with New Zealand. He referred back — in other words — reverse delegated to the manager who had the conversation with the team lead there, so that the appropriate needs were addressed. This could have been sorted out if the manager had equipped him with the data in a digestible, process-based format. The manager spotted the gap, wrote out the agenda the second time around and provided the bullet points of his discussions going forward.
Story 2:
Bharathi is insecure about the database that has been an ongoing challenge in the company. She doesn’t want to own responsibility for the outcome, so she takes the easy way out, referring the restructuring back to the manager time and again. The manager takes it on each time, as she doesn’t want to risk losing Bharathi, who she values as an employee. But that is a weak way of dealing with the issue. Sitting down and talking about the recurring pattern of reverse delegation, asking Bharathi to own responsibility for the database that forms an important part of her customer relations role and that she is best equipped to know the nuances of and assuring her she will not be penalised for attempting the database structuring, is the right the way forward.
Story 3:
Anita returned the travel file to Arjun as an indirect way of telling him that she doesn’t feel the task allotted to her was suited to her profile as Vice-President.
This is an issue that has to be discussed; either she has to realise that travel is an important component of the company’s success and her personal involvement, getting her hands dirty, is a good signal for the rest of the VPs, or, someone has to be appointed to assist Anita.
Story 4:
Vimal is a habitual shirker, he seems to have made a practice of giving excuses and easing out of jobs. He says he can’t get sponsors for the event as he is busy with the seminar. He can’t follow up the pending payments either, as he is tied up with the delivery team; he can’t retrieve the client details as he still has the financial reports to file. So he is always doing something else rather than what he should be doing. Just because he delivers some of the goods, he gets away with key components. It was clear he needed the pink slip, instead of the manager taking the flak all the time.
There are times when it is not the employee or team member’s fault, such as in story 1 or 2. Delegation without giving enough information, or when the employees feel they will be penalised, are instances in which reverse delegation is bound to happen. The buck gets handed back to the manager. It is up to the manager to assist, empower and ensure it is not repeated. Here are some tips I’ve learned from experience:
Give clear instructions
Give examples of how it worked and where to go for further details
Show the employees how they can take decisions
Show them where you will help
Provide templates and references where it is possible to empower them
Encourage and publicly applaud independence
If mistakes happen, encourage them to learn from experience Refuse to take ‘No’ for an answer
Reverse delegation is acceptable only where team work is involved and the manager can make the difference and value-add quickly, while the employee is productive elsewhere. So, other than in such cases, do let’s follow the seven steps above and encourage our teams to go ahead and accept responsibility for doing things the right way.
(The writer is CEO of www.globaladjustments.com. She can be reached at info@globaladjustments.com)
| This entry was posted by Global Indian on May 16, 2011 at 11:32 PM, and is filed under Business Line column for the New Manager by Ranjini Manian, Training. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site. |
No trackbacks yet.
Comments are closed.








about 2 years ago
Ranjini, you have a wonderful way of both identifying the organizational challenges in Indian business, but of also giving concrete steps that will address them.
As you know, this problem is not just Indian, as we have the “delegating-up” problem in the West. In part, it is a result of our schooling where the students learn a lot about things, but hardly have an opportunity to develop their own inner self-confidence. Second, the we still have the leadership model of “telling the subordinate what to do,” rather than “dialoguing about the challenge” with the subordinates. In this way, the leader think the subordinate understands, but doesn’t really have the respect to check this out. Third, in defense of the subordinates, I know many who are frustrated because the “decision makers” at the top seem to like to avoid making decisions. In short, thanks for inspiring such a timely reflective discussion.
about 2 years ago
Thanks for your comment dear Charles I am responding from Stuttgart where I just completed an Understanding Indian business culture session for an automotive CEO Roundtable and there were many good questions looks like this and other phenomena are universal indeed and as the CEO of Aston Martin said to me we have to build a ‘Cool` company and brand caring about people internal and external
about 2 years ago
I liked this piece. One thing that is clearly emerging from a study of all 4 situations, is clear that it is the management style of the manager that provides the answer to the issue on hand. For example in Story 1 Shyam needed the information in a structured manner to deliver. thankfully the Manager learnt. In story 2 assigning a assignment to Bharathi with a rider that Bharathi will not be accountable for a failure- is a recipe for disaster. In story 3, not being able to make Anitha realise that she will have the choice but be responsible for the consequences is a case of a “paternalistic” ( pardon me for not being politically correct with semantics) style that is not an answer in a professional work environment and so it goes on and on.
The underlying reality is that we need a metrics driven, inclusive, team oriented organisation design that will be the only answer to avoid the reverse delegations that we see in workspaces .
about 2 years ago
Dear Ravi
Thanks for comments on each story esp as they were all real life
about 2 years ago
Ranjini
A very thoughtful piece indeed. I have also noticed many managers all over the world have the habit of taking the “monkey on their own back” in such situations. More often than not, it is a case of weak leadership. The more you do this, the more encouraged subordinates get about giving the monkey back to you.
Thanks for pointing this out in such an elegant way.
about 2 years ago
Thankyou Mr Peshawaria
A comment from too many bosses Too few Leaders on our page is a great honour I recognise this same monkey myself
about 2 years ago
A very intersting topic.
Reverse delegation is a clear sign of lack of empowerment of subordinates. Higher management needs to do a lot of introspection when they see such instances. The subordinates may need more training or be allowed to make mistakes. For the latter, the correct path should be shown via examples on what the right course should have been. Castigations end up sending them in a shell.
Assignment driven (as against idea driven) organizations also have the problem of reverse delegation. Escalations upstream become the norm.
Since you (the manager) did not delegate responsiblity and authority appropriately, the work keep on coming back to roost.
So, delegating authority and responsiblity in equal measure will help avoid this issue.
about 2 years ago
Thankyou Navjit clear empowerment as a key you point out has room for improvement almost everywhere and I will personally keep this in mind too